Building a high end PC for under $2000 in 2011? Here is my 2 cents worth - A guide and PC configuration

When was the last time you purchased a new desktop PC? Or have you switched to the "laptop computer generation"? Or even worse, have you gone down to the "dark path" of using those mass produced, style over quality (lack of character),

and massively over priced Apple stuff?

No matter what you are using for your computer solution. At the end of the day, custom built desktop PC will always produce better performance and faster in speed over laptop or Apple computers any day.

The problem is, not many people know how to build a high end, custom PC. Having recently acquired a new PC after my 4 year old rig died due to power supply failure, I have re-entered the world of custom PC building and did some research, and I will like to share some information on the config of building a high end, custom PC for all your home computing solutions (server, gaming, movies, internet, music, work etc..)

All for the cost of under 2000 Australian dollars.

You might ask, why not just buy Apple? Well, after playing around with Apple Mac Pro online config, I found out to buy a Mac Pro with the roughly the same CPU power, but only with 50% of graphics power compare to the PC I am about to configure for you, it will cost you at least $4300 dollars!!

I know! What a rip off! Paying more than twice the price for something that is not as fast... that is why I've always thought going down the road of Apple = going down the path of the "dark side", flashy but with no real value.

So without further delay, let me get started in my guide.

Before I start with my config, I will show you the config of my new PC, then compare the config of the PC I am recommending. So you can see the differences.

My PC Built:

CPU: Intel i7-2600k@3.4GHz, socket LGA1155 ($332)

Motherboard: ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe motherboard, socket LGA1155 ($299)

Graphics card: 2 x Gigabyte Geforce GTX570 (in SLI) ($372 each, so $744 altogether for two cards in SLI)

RAM: 4 x 4GB (16GB) Corsair Vengeance low profile heat sink RAM ($164)

CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D14 high performance CPU cooler ($90)

Case: Silverstone Raven RV01 ($192)

Power Supply Unit: Antec Quattro true power 1200w PSU ($267)

HDD: 4 x 2TB HDD running in RAID O. I didn't have to buy HDD, because I already have them.

Total cost = $2088

My computer has exceeded the $2000 limit by 88 bucks, and this is without HDD. If I had to buy HDD, the total cost would have gone up to $2300 at least. This because I deliberately purchased a more expensive motherboard, and bought an overkill 1200w PSU, and a massive heatsink the size of a small turbine. However, now that I have put my PC together, I realized that if I were to do it again, I could have configured a PC with the almost identical performance, but with a better tower case at a lower price, to save some money.

Intersection:

You might wonder, why using the LGA1155 CPU and not the new LGA2011 CPU? Currently, there are three types of Intel LGA2011 CPU being released. The i7-3820 ($327), i7-3930k ($680), and i7-3960x ($1270). The motherboards for LGA2011 are within the range of $300~$500. With the top of range LGA2011 CPU (i7-3960x) having a performance increase of roughly 25% over the LGA1155 i7-2600k. (source: Passmark ).

In case you haven't noticed, the new LGA 2011 i7-3960x cost over $1000! And that is just the CPU. To build a full PC with the i7-3960x will cost you almost $3000! So unless you are rich and loaded with cash to spend, I would say LGA1155 is still the best buy for your money.

As for the LGA2011 i7-3930k, at $680 it really isn't Worth your money (the motherboard and CPU will cost you $1000 already!) Here is another review from bit-tech where they tested the i7-3930k, and reported that most general PC users should still stick with LGA1155 (article from bi-tech)

The general consensus here is, for most general PC users. It is better to stick with Intel i7-LGA 1155 CPU, especially the i7-2600k (or the i7-2700k). As the i7 LGA2011 are aimed for enthusiasts with nothing better to do than to spend their money. The i7 LGA 1155 are still the best for its costs.

So here is the config I would recommend, for a 2011 high end PC under $2000:

The config I will recommend for you:

CPU: Intel i7-2600k LGA1155 ($332)

The i7-2600k is extremely overclockable, not only it is already very fast at stock speed. But its unlocked function allows you go overclock to 5GHz per core.. provided that you have a good CPU cooler. The 2600k is still one of the best CPU on the market.

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 ($178)

This motherboard is almost as good as the ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe, and almost $110 cheaper too (I wish I can exchange my MB to this one.. too late).

In case if the sales person tell you to buy the Gigabyte G1 Sniper 2 motherboard, which cost $420.. DO NOT fall for it.. the G1 Sniper 2 has some additional features but most users are not likely to be utilizing them. Asrock Z68 Extreme 4 Gen3 is all you need. I promise!

Graphics card: 2 x Gigabyte Geforce GTX570 (in SLI) ($372 each, so $744 altogether for two cards in SLI)

The Geforce GTX570 is a very powerful card. However, to ensure that your PC can stand up to the the test of time in future generation games. I recommend multiple GPU setup. So do not hesitate! Grab two Geforce GTX570, it's worth it!

According to this benchmark test (source: Guru3D), two GTX570 out performs two ATI Radeon 5870 by 28% (at Apple store, one Radeon 5870 will cost $500, so two Radeon 5870 will cost $1000! Why is Apple selling something not as good for higher price? I don't really know). Two GTX570 also outperform one GTX580 by 43%, and one GTX580 will cost you $580 by itself. Yes, two GTX580 will out perform GTX570 by 10%, but you will also need extra $300 to buy those! So in my opinion, in terms of costs and performance, the GTX570 SLI is the winning combination.

RAM: 2 x 4GB (8GB) Corsair Vengeance low profile heat sink RAM ($82)

After I installed 16GB, I realized with the current level of software. No home PC user is ever going to need that much RAM, unless you are planning to setup RAM drive. So just get 8GB is enough!

IMPORTANT NOTE!!!!

A side note with RAM. When you buy RAM, MAKE SURE to buy RAM that come with low profile heat sinks (no protruding fins and such). This is because most awesome CPU cooler only have RAM clearance of less than 45mm, while RAM with high profile heat sink usually have height of approximately 50mm. This means the RAM is going to be in the way to your CPU cooler! This can be a very disappointing experience!

CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo ($48)

After I read some reviews, it turned out that this CPU cooler is really good for its price. Unless you are planning to overclock your i7-2600k to over 5GHz per core, I would say the CoolerMaster Hyper 212 Evo is more than enough for most overclocking situations.

Case: Silverstone Raven RV03 ($164)

In my new PC, I used the Silverstone Raven RV01, which is an older generation case released over 2 years ago. The Raven RV03, was released a month ago, and after reading some reviews. I almost wish I can return my Raven RV01 and get this one instead! Not only it is cheaper by $30, but the Raven RV03 also features improved cable management, more HDD hot swap bays and such! With the Raven series trademark of 90 degrees rotated motherboard orientation, for stacking effect cooling.

By rotating the motherboard by 90 degrees, this means the output connectors for mouse, keyboard, USB, video are on the top of the case. All the Raven cases share this unique design. The case has two fans at the bottom to suck/push up cold air for cooling the PC components. And because hot air rises due to its lower density (PV = nRT, as temperature T goes up, the volume V goes up. Since the mass flow rate of the air remains constant, the density reduces), there is a fan on top of the case to pull the hot air out of the case.

Theoretically, the Raven should produce superb cooling effects to your PC components. From different reviews, the RV03 has been greatly improved since RV01, and the cooling effect is really good. Watch this video for demonstration of stacking effect.

Therefore, Raven RV03 is in my opinion. One of the best full tower cases in 2011. Even better than Coolermaster HAF942, because RV03 looks better as well.

Power Supply Unit: Antec 900w high current power supply ($156)

HDD: 2 x Hitachi 1TB Deskstar 7200rpm HDD running RAID 0 ($115 each, so $230 all together)

The reason why I am using RAID 0 in this config is because RAID 0, is stripe set, higher bandwidth = great speed. But note that in RAID 0, is one drive fails, then the entire array will be stuffed. Meaning higher chance of data loss.

If you want redundancy, you can setup RAID 1 (mirroring) instead. However, remember that if you set up RAID 1, you will only have one hard drive storage space instead of two. Because everything is mirrored to the second hard drive.

Or you can just not use RAID at all, the choice is yours.

Note that this PC config leaves room for future upgrade to SSD (Solid State Drives), when they become cheaper.

Total cost = $1964

So here it is, this is my 2 cents in, for $1964 AUD you can get a very high end PC for the best quality home PC solution in 2011 and beyond!

Movie review: Warrior

I will begin this review by saying this. "Warrior", is my most favorite film of 2011".

While the name of the movie sounds generic, and the trailer looked cheesy. The movie itself, in my opinion, is the best sports drama since Rocky.

While Rocky is about an underdog story of American dream coming true, but I prefer Warrior, because at the core of this movie, it is the message about forgiveness, love and family that makes Warrior a more meaningful movie than Rocky.

Synopsis:

The movies starts with Tommy (Tom Hardy) paying visit to his former alcoholic father Paddy (Nick Nolte), after years of disappearance. During the visit, Tommy found out that Paddy has been fighting his alcoholic addiction for 3 years, and have become a Christian, and is sorry for all the past hurts he had to done to his family (such as neglecting his family, and domestic violence). Tommy, carrying resentment towards his father, mocked his father's new found faith and adapted a very harsh, and sarcastic attitude towards his father's pleads for forgiveness.

Paddy informed Tommy that his older brother Brendon (Joel Edgerton), is married with two kids, and have become a high school physics teacher. Carrying anger and resentment towards his father and brother for leaving him and his mother (who is deceased), Tommy left Paddy's house. The next day, Tommy signed up to at a gym, and in a unintentional bout for 200 dollars, defeated the top contender for UFC middle weight championship. Tommy returned to Paddy, and ask him to be his trainer, but all the time mocking Paddy. Tommy's reason was because he is interested in competing in "Sparta", a MMA event where the winner walks away with 500 million dollars. However, he refused to tell his father his motivation for joining this competition.

In the meantime, Brendon is struggling with finance. He was informed by the bank that he will loose his house if he can't pay the mortgage. It is revealed that Brendon is in debt because he was trying to pay for his daughter's heart surgery the year before. Unable to pay the debt on his school teacher salary. Brendon went back into MMA fighting, but became suspended by school after he was discovered for participating in MMA matches. After seeing an advertisement, Brendon visited his old friend, asked to be trained and also joined Sparta, in hope of getting the prize money for solve his family's financial problem.

As the story unfolds, it turned into a family drama about forgiveness, dealing with past hurts and loving relationship between a repenting father and his two sons, together with some top notch MMA actions.

My thoughts:

As I stated at the opening line of this review. Warrior is my most favorite film of 2011. Not only is the movie very well done, but it portrayals of the characters in the movie are very realistic, and so humane that I think anyone can somewhat be related to it.

Paddy is a former alcoholic who not only ruined his own family, but also brought a lot of hurt to his two sons and his deceased wife. Having become a Christian, Paddy is looking for forgiveness and a chance of renewing his relationship with his two sons. However, he struggled because both of his two sons are unwilling to forgive him, and to see Nick Nolte's performance as Paddy is heart wrenching.

Brendon's story is more straight forward, his motivation for fighting in MMA is fueled by his desperate attempt to protect, and to care of his family. However, as the story progresses, Brendon also had to, in his heart deal with his irresponsible past actions for leaving Tommy and his mother, although he is the elder brother in the family. At the same time, Brendon had to struggled to forgive his repenting father. Although I have to say that Brendon is probably my less favorite character in this film, because I doubt he really forgave his father at all. (Can you forgive someone without trusting them? This is a good question worthy of discussion).

Tommy is the most interesting character in this movie. At the start of the movie, Tommy's intention is totally unknown. Only that Tommy is a an extremely angry individual who harbors a lot of resentment towards his father and brother for the past hurts. However, as the story unfolds, Tommy's past and his motivations is fully revealed, and despite his harsh words and sarcastic comments to his father, Tommy's deep love for his father was eventually shown in two most heart moving scenes toward the end of the film (which I won't spoil).

The base plot of the movie is not complex, but the depth of the characters and their relationships with each other is so complex, and relevant to everyday people like you and me, that makes Warrior a relentless, and brutally honest sports/family drama that is a must see in 2011.

Conclusion:

Story 9.2/10 - Personally, the story in Warrior is my favorite type of movie stories. Simple, easy to follow storyline with in depth, complex characters and a realistic portrayal of human and family relationships. Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton's performances as Tommy and Brendon are outstanding!

Cinematography - 9/10: I would complain that the camera was a bit shaky, to eminent a sense of realism in a drama movie such as this. However, personally I don't like the shaky camera style, but some of the scenes captured the character's thoughts and emotions really well. The MMA actions are well choreographed!

Sex/nudity - none

Violence - Heavy: There are plenty of MMA/UFC actions, so is it violent? Yes I would say it is violent, but no more violent than watching a boxing match.

Final score: 9.1/10 - Good story, and top notch performances from Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton. The result is a unique, powerful, compelling, and heart moving family drama set in the world of MMA. It is one of those extremely rare boxing/fighting movies that you don't want to see either fighter loose. If you are planning to go to the cinema soon, make this a priority on your "to watch" list. Most importantly, it raises a good discussion topic on "can you forgive someone without trusting them?"

Movie Review: Real Steel

Have you ever wanted to see a movie with both elements from "Rocky" and "Transformers"? Well, look no further, "Real Steel" is such a title.

Released in 2011, Real Steel is essentially an action packed, family oriented drama blending with elements from sci-fi movies. And did I mention the giant robots made of shiny metals?

Is this movie good? Well, while it might have borrowed a lot of elements from "Rocky", and the plot is very predictable and somewhat cliched, but to be honest.. I really enjoyed it.

Story:

The year is 2016, the world of fighting/boxing sports has changed dramatically. In the future sporting world of boxing, human no longer fight, people make robots to fight in the ring.

Hugh Jackman plays Charlie Kenton, an ex-boxer who is competing in the boxing ring using robots. Charlie tries to make money by betting on the matches that his robot partipates in. The problem is, luck is often not with him, and soon Charlie became heavily in debt.

At this point, he was informed of the death of his ex-girlfriend. Charlie was told that he has a son Max, who is 11 years old and as the next of kin, Charlie has the legal custody to Max. However, Max's aunts wants to take custody of Max from Charlie, because Charlie is not only irresponsible, and he is also a terrible father who abandoned Max and his mother at Max's birth.

To resolve his debt problem, and also as a way to restart his robot fighting career, Charlie made a secret deal to sell the custody of Max to his aunts, for a price of 100,000 dollars. However, to keep the deal a secret, Charlie can only surrender the custody of Max after he has spend a summer with Max.

Taking the payment, Charlie purchased a Japanese robot, and participated in a match. However, because Charlie was not familar with the control of the new robot, he lost the match and his new robot was destroyed in the ring. Leaving Charlie further in debt. In a desperate attempt to rebuild a robot, Charlie sneaked into a robot junkyard trying to steal some old parts. In the process, his son Max accidently slipped off a cliff, and by chance was saved when he became stuck to an arm of a scrap robot lying on the floor. With much gratitude, Max dug the offline robot out of the dirt. The discovery of this old robot, will not only change Charlie's fortune, but will also change Charlie and Max's father-son relationship, and help Charlie to grow into a father that he was meant to be....

My thoughts on the movie:

Hugh Jackman's character Charlie, is a washed up boxer, heavily in debt, yet refuses to take up his responsibility as a father to raise his son. However, by the end of the movie, Charlie finally learnt the mistakes of his past ways, and made a commitment to change.

Many elements of this movies are borrowed from "Rocky", but at its core, this is a redemptive story about an irresponsible man's journey to grow up, and realizing how to love his son whom he had always neglected.

As I said at the beginning of the review, this movie has many cliched moments, and a lot of borrowed ideas from other movies. But I really liked the redemptive themed central plot.. Maybe I am getting softer and softer as I get older, but I have to admit at some heart warming moments in this movie, I found the corners of my eyes getting slightly wet...

Final Conclusion:

Story 7/10 - This is essentially "Rocky + Over the Top + Transformers". While it may not be the most original idea, but the essence of the story is good enough, and it is just refreshing to see a family oriented movie focusing on father and son relationship.

Movie design and special effects 9/10 - Needless to say, a Hollywood movie of this category typically includes multi-million dollar CGI and such, "Real Steel" is no exception. The robots look great, and the robot fighting scenes are very well done.

Violence - moderate - Some of the scenes depict the destruction of robots, and since this is a movie about Robots fighting each other in the ring, there are a lot of fighting scenes.

Sex/Nudity none - Sex and nudity scenes are almost non-existent in this movie.

Final score: 7.4/10 - Despite the borrowed elements from other movies, Real Steel, is a very well made movie that deserves your viewing. I think most people who watch this will generally enjoy the movie for its outstanding special effects, and the simple story telling of a father's journey to rebuild the relationship with his son.

Movie review: Tyson

Mike Tyson, is the fomer undisputed heavy weight boxing champion of the world. Besides being the 2 time heavy weight champion, he was also the youngest boxer to win a bunch of heavy weight championships. He is so good at what he does when he was young, that some people use "like Mike Tyson in his prime" to describe someone who is really on top of his/her game, and nicknamed "The baddest man on the planet".

People will also remember Tyson for his controversial life style, biting his opponent's ear, rape accusation, and all sorts of other things.

In 2008, a documentary film was made by James Toback about Mike Tyson, who without doubt is one of the most memorial athlete in the history of sports.

To be honest, I thought Tyson was just some naturally talented boxer who made it big, and became spoiled by his fortune and then went into a downward spiral. However, after I watched this documentary film, I got a whole new insight about Tyson, and also a deeper understanding about many other issues in life.

The film started with a 10 minutes footage of Tyson in his prime, at the pinnacle of his career. Boxing and conquering all of his opponents with unmatched skills, skills and aurora. Then Tyson began to talk about his early childhood and his fractured family, where he had no strong male role model as he was growing up.

At this point I was really surprised when Tyson talked about how he was bullied when he was a child, and how after the first time he fought back against the bully. He was determined that he will not be bullied again. His violent reactions to being bullied eventually got him into a youth detention centre. Where he first encoutered boxing, Tyson had great interest in boxing, and after his time at the detention centre. Tyson found his mentor "Cus D'Amato, who not only became his couch in boxing, but also became a father figure for him.

At this point, Tyson choke back the tears as he talked about the devastation on him when his mentor died of old age.

From there, Tyson's life went into a downard spiral, from a divorce that left Tyson angry and empty, which led to to his drug use problem and living a life of over indulgence in all things material.

The documentary ended with Tyson describing his last few fights after he was released from the prison. Where he found himself has a new found perspective and respect about family and life, and have lost the desire to fight..

As Tyson said after he lost a match which would be his retirement, that although he had the ability to stay in shape, but he just doesn't have that fighting desire anymore. All he wanted to do was to watch his kids grow and raise them to the best of his abilities.

My thoughts:

First of all, this is a great documentary. Even if you are not a fan of documentary, boxing (which I know nothing about) or Tyson, you will still find many things in this film that you will like.

As I watched this film, I realized a few important truths about human society.

One of the most striking realization for me, is the undeniable importance of a strong male model in a child's growing up process. One of Tyson's biggest tragedy as a child was that he had no strong role model to show him what is the right thing to do when he was bullied. Having no strong male role model to guide and inspire him, Tyson resorted to violence and habored a lot of anger and fear for a long time in his life. The anger and fear did help him to become one of the most fearful, dominant boxer in history, but it also ruined him as a person.

I often wonder how can gay/lesbian couples who want to adapt child can honestly claim they can raise a child with a healthy character, in absence of a strong male role model or an obvious motherly figure. Just as God created man and woman in His image (so both men and women are both children of God), God has also assigned different responsibilities and roles for men and women in all aspects of our lives, because he created us to be similar yet so different.

Fathers are called to be good fathers and leaders of his family who needs to teach, encourage and inspire his children in a good way, and living out a life of Godly example (model) to their children. In our modern society, how many fathers are bad role models to their children because they don't understand what it means to be a man?

Although I have never being a father, nor have I being married. But from the Bible I can know what God's purpose for me as a man is. I can know my identity and purpose to live out God's calling for me as a human male in this world. It is a tragedy that our society has departed from the Bible and its teachings, so men today are becoming confused with our God given identity, calling, responsibilities and purposes.

Sometimes I wonder if true Masculinity is dead, and in its place we are brain washed and fooled into thinking it is our: social status, intelligence, good looks, physical prowess, money, social skills, beer consumption, risk taking behavior, porn consumption, number of sex partners, new age ideas, metro-sexual lifestyle, or whatever (the list goes on) that defines our masculinity.

Or have men's backs being bent in the pressure of feminism and we have forgotten our calling to be true men of God? To live a life worthy of God's purpose for us as men?

Anyway, I am glad that Tyson has seemingly worked out his issues by now, and is presently dedicated to be a good father to his children, which is very inspiring.

Final score: 4/5

Video game review: Deus Ex Human Revolution

Albert Einstein said "Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of pathological criminal." Is technological progress always good for our human existence on this planet? Should we play God, and use technology to speed up the human evolutionary progress, to improve our human potentials?

This is, the main theme of Deus Ex: Human Revolution. A new addition to the "Deux Ex" franchise originally released in 2000. The first Deux Ex game was a great success, and the game is widely known today as an action/RPG classic. 11 years after the first Deus Ex game. Eidos Montreal has released Deus Ex: Human Revolution, a prequel to the first Deus Ex game.

Story:

Deus Ex Human Revolution, is a cyberpunk action/RPG. Set in 15 years from modern day (2027). In the story, in 2027 the world has reached an era when the society has begin to use biomedical engineering technology to improve our human status. Through the use of biomedical augmentation and genetic modification on the human body. This major trend to implementing human augmentations is driven mainly by international, multi-billion dollar corporations. The movement takes the form of 21th century renaissance, and much debate is presented at UN if human augmentation is a good or a bad thing. The player takes control of a highly trained security personnel Adam Jensen, an employer at a biomedical augmentation company Sarif. An incident occurred where a group of unidentified terrorist assaulted the company HQ, and kidnapped a group of scientists. Adam Jensen, was heavily injured during his attempt to stop the terrorists. In the status of near death, Adam Jensen was rushed to the emergency operating room and received military class augementations. 6 months later, Jensen worked relentlessly trying to uncover the true identity of the terrorists that assaulted his employer. In the process, discovered a series of intriguing conspiracies and secret plots that will ultimately challenge humanity on the question of "should we use technology to propel us ahead of our progress in natural evolution?"

Gameplay and design:

Deux Ex: Human Revolution is an action/RPG game. The player will be able to travel in an open needed, near futuristic world. Most of the game takes place in two mega cities: Detroiet, and Heng Sha. The city design and environment is believable and eye catching, and feels like something that is taken from the movie "Blade Runner". Being an open ended world RPG game also means the player will have the freedom to roam the cities, explore, talk to NPCs, and perform side quests in any order you choose. Overall, the environment in this game is very well designed and crafted.

In terms of the actual gameplay and combat mechancis. Deus Ex Human Revolution is primary a FPS stealth game. However, the game designer has implemented a 3rd person view when in stealth mode. This means the game gives players options of some of the most non-linear game play in today's video game titles. To complete a mission, the player can choose to either: shoot your way through, use stealth to remain undetected, or brawl your way through the levels assassin style! Like all RPG titles, Deux Ex has an experience system where the player will be rewaraded with experience points through completing objectives or taking down enemies. The experience points can be used to purchase augmentation upgrades that will make Jensen more powerful, depending on how you want to play your game. The non-linear game play in this game is very well designed, and when it all works, it works really well.

While the game play of Deux Ex Human revolution is truly marvelous. However, I do have to criticize three elements in the game. First of all, in the game, the player will have to perform a lot of "hacking" mini games. To hack into computer systems or door security console to gain access that are critical to completing objectives. The "hacking' mini game is essentially a race against time to control "nodes". While the concept is simple, but it somewhat feels like a repetitive exercise that could have been left out of the game.

Another criticism is the dumb AI. For some reason, the game designer has implemented some of the most stupid AI I've seen in recently released video games. Although the AI is dumb, but your enemies, especially at later stage will have ridiculous amount of health, making it extremely difficult to take them out using projectile weapons, and will force you to use the stealth/take down approach instead. This lead to a highly unbalanced game play that can be quite frustrating at times.

Thirdly, the zoom in/out from first person view into third person view in stealth can be quite annoying sometimes. Personally, I do not understand why Edios Montreal didn't implement the option to let players choose either first person or third person view. I mean, when in stealth mode, the camera zooms out and you get to see Adam Jensen, and he looks awesome. But the moment you go back to normal running/sneaking the camera zooms in to first person and you can't see Adam Jensen anymore..

My thoughts on the game:

I have always tried, to the best of my ability to review a video game story based on Christian world view. So here I would like to talk about my thoughts on the story of Deus Ex Human Revolution. I guess the main theme of the story is, "should we play God and use biomedical technology to enhance our human abilities?"

In the story of Human Revolution, augmented human can perform wondrous feats such as: improve their social skill through enhancement chips, lift cars, see through walls, perform super human feats, be connected to networks 24/7, and to many extents, such augementations can help to cure many diseases. But, is it a good thing?

Although this is a sci-fi story, but it is not something out of total fantasy. It is actually very real. Right now, as we speak, our genetic engineering technology is improving by the seconds. With the much debated ethics of human cloning technology still on the table, and stem cell research. I think it is highly likely that in the very near future, our technological progress will reach a point when, we can use our genetic engineering and biomedical engineering technology to make us super humans. Or even prolong human life spam to unimaginable length.

Personally, I cannot find any passages in the Bible that addresses topics of if human cloning or genetic engineering is right or wrong. However, certain Biblical wisdom can still help us to be aware of our situation.

While most technologies are invented with good intentions, to make our world better. At the same time it is also often abused and perverted into something bad, because of our sinful human nature and the tendency to abuse good things for our own selfish and sinful intentions. For example, the internet, can be used to improve communication, but at the same time it has also been perverted into an instrument to view pornography, stealing money, fraud and identity theft, and have created a generation that lacks face to face social interaction skills.

If Deus Ex Human Revolution reminds me of one thing, then that is our science and technology cannot solve all of our problems. Our proposed solutions through science and technology have, in the past been double edged swords that cuts deeply into the well being of our world, just as we reaps benefits from its wake. It is because we, the human are inherently flawed creatures.

So maybe the problem isn't with the technology that has been invented, but the problem is actually the end user of the technology. As Einstein said "Technological progress, is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal". So one day, if we do have the technology to make us "better and stronger" physically, will we use it for good? Or will we abuse it? Will it be better for the world? I wonder if the technology to make us more than we are meant to be will pave the way for unforetold human injustice and tragedy. It is impossible to tell right now. It seems it is what people do with technology that determine the outcome of such technological progression, and people have not always employed technology for good courses.

So how do we propose to approach the 21th century with all these new powerful inventions in our grasps, while we know so little of the long term consequences? What does it mean to be human? As inventors of technologies, how do we avoid letting technology rule over us, so we are not changed fundamentally from what we are truly meant to be by our technologies (socially and biologically)?

This, is a question worthy of time to think about. Actually, this is a question that I need to think about as well. I think Biblical wisdom is a good starting point to find the answers to this pending challenge of our era.

Conclusion

Story: (9.3/10): I think Deux Ex Human Revolution has one of the best story line in video games. It is a story of where conspiracy theories interweaves with human struggle in grasping hold of our place in the line of technological progression. The ending of the game is thought provoking, and the story is well narrated.

Gameplay and design (8.7/10): The environment design is amazing and believable, feels like something from Blade Runner. The combat mechanics is solid, but the dumb AI, annoying first person view and the meaningless hacking mini game is withholding an otherwise spectacular game.

Sex/nudity: none

Violence: heavy: Not recommended for people under 15 years of age

Final verdict: 9/10: Deus Ex: Human Revolution, with its engaging and thought provoking storyline, makes it a truly worthy sequel in the Deux Ex franchise. The gameplay is solid, the game environment is well crafted. This is truly one of the better RPG released in 2011.

Book Review: The Call of Cthulhu and other Weird Tales by HP Lovecraft (Vintage Classics)

Introduction:

Howard Phillips Lovecraft, was an American sci-fi, horror fiction author, who often based his stories on "cosmic horror". Most of his stories were published between 1920's-1930's, and although you might have never read his stories before, but you have definitely seen something that are inspired by HP Lovecraft's horror stories. For example, if you are a Metallica fan, you would know that the band has an instrumental song "The Call of Cthulhu", which is inspired by the Lovecraft story of the same name. Or "Arkham Asylum" in the Batman mythos, is inspired by Lovecraft's fictional American city of "Arkham".

Stephen King, have said that Lovecraft, is "The twentith century's greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale". While some other said Lovecraft is the comparable to Edgar Allan Poe in terms of his wild imagination, and the ability to weave the most spine chilling tales of the unimaginable.

Personally, I have never been a fan of horror fiction, and I have never picked up any of Stephen King's novels, and I am only about one third of way into a massive Edgar Alan Poe collection. However, I've always wanted to read some HP Lovecraft stories, only because I heard that back in the 30's, HP Lovecraft was a good friend of my most favorite author "Robert E. Howard", the creator of Conan the Cimmerian. This duo, is kind of similar to J.R.R. Tolkein and C.S. Lewis, the only difference is that HP Lovecraft is an atheist, and Robert E. Howard, has a very strange view about the world that is obviously twisted. Unlike the friendship between Tolkein and Lewis where both are Christians.

Anyway, I was not sure which collection of HP Lovecraft to buy. There is a book published by Library America, featuring most of Lovecraft's famous stories, and there is another volume called "Necronomicon", published by GollanczF, a massive tome containing a well collected library of Lovecraft's literary works. As a new comer to HP Lovecraft, I wasn't sure if it would be worth it to invest the bucks into getting those collector's books. Until one day, during a casual walkthrough at the book store, I stumbled across this book, "The Call of Cthulhu and the other Weird tales of HP Lovecraft", published by Vintage classics, the book only costs 12 dollars. At 551 pages, contains 12 of Lovecraft's most mind shattering horror stories.

In the last 2 weeks, I have been reading this book after work, while hiding under my blankets and paging through stories after stories of fantastic cosmic horror tales. And I have come to the conclusion that, HP Lovecraft not only has a great command of the English language, but he also seem to have the unique ability to weave sci-fi horror stories by using the combination of scientific and prose language. A style of which I have yet to see in most modern authors. Undoubtedly, Lovecraft is a great writer, and his stories are good. It is enough to send chills up your spine, and make you want to lit small lights while you are sleeping at night.

My thoughts:

What are my thoughts are Lovecraft's stories?

Well, to begin with. I am quite offended by the racist remarks and quotes in Lovecraft's writings. I have no doubt that Lovecraft, is obviously xenophobic and racist at the same time. This is evident in his stories where he continuously degraded people coming from non-English or non-white backgrounds.

However, if you are going to delve in HP Lovecraft's writings, and you are a Christian it might be worthwhile to note that there is a recurring theme in all of his writings. See, all of Lovecraft's horror stories are based on one concept. That human beings are created as a joke, an accident by an ancient alien species that ruled the earth millions of years ago. As Lovecraft described in "At the mountain of madness". An alien species came to this planet eons ago, and created life as an experiment, and through evolution, life have reached the diversity that exist now on the face of this planet. In "The Call of Cthulhu", Lovecraft have created this fictional race of aliens, who were rulers of the earth until a major disaster struck them that caused their decline, and in the story, it was said that one day, their high priest Cthulhu shall rise again to rule over the world, and destroy human kind on his ascension.

Therefore, I sensed that Lovecraft had embedded his atheistic belief that the universe, is a cruel place and that our existence, is but a joke and a freak accident. Nothing more.... Another theme I detected in Lovecraft's stories is that, in most of his stories, Lovecraft often create fictional occult groups that worships the evil alien race that created life on earth. I wonder if Lovecraft was trying to compare religious groups with the occult groups in his stories.

Overall, I sensed a lot of atheistic undertone in Lovecraft's stories. Furthermore, I detected that Lovecraft is out there trying to mock religious people. However, it is interesting to see that a lot of elements of the modern "neo-atheist" belief was already flourishing back in the 1930's.

As a Christian, while I did appreciate Lovecraft's horror tales, and find them worthwhile reading because of its undeniable literary values, but at the same time. I have to make my stand and point out the illogical view of atheist thinking, and I disagree with Lovecraft's atheistic view presented in his writings.

How can people really believe that the universe is a cruel place, and all that ever existed is nothing but a joke?

Can you really believe that? Can we really believe that? To take on this atheistic worldview, will mean that love, for example has no meaning at all. The love for your family and friends, will be nothing but a sick joke if our existence is an ultimate sarcastic joke with no purpose nor meaning.

The universe, was not meant to be a cruel place with no purpose nor meaning. In Genesis chapter 1, it said "God" created the universe. It is a creation process with structure, purpose and meaning, with every step of creation, the bible says "And God saw that it was good". See, when God created everything, it was meant to be "GOOD", with "good" purpose and "good" meaning, not cruel and meaningless as the neo atheist view want us to believe.

Unlike Lovecraft's evil alien race who created life on earth, who sees human beings as nothing but playthings and a joke. The God of Christianity, is a loving and just creator who loves His own creations so much that He even gave his only son, Jesus Christ to the world, to save the those who believe in Him for eternal life (John 3:16: For God so loved the world that He gave his only son, so that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life).

So what do you believe? Do you believe that the universe is cruel and our existence has no meaning? Or are you unsure and don't want to think about it, only focusing on the things of the present? I implore you to use your common sense, which belief is right ? To believe that life, love, family, friends, and everything has no meaning, purpose and will end with aboslute nothingness, because it's all an accident? Or to believe that everything has meaning and purpose because there is a God that loves us so much that he even gave us his only son, Jesus Christ and there is hope, with something true and eternal?

This, is I think, the most important question and decision that we all have to make, at some stage of our lives. I can only pray that you will make the right one before it is too late. For the space-time continuum for us creatures, is a one way arrow, with our lives fading away but as glimpse of the blurring past millenia from now. At the end, only what we believe will matter at the end of this seemingly everlasting continuum, when we meet our creator.

Book rating: 4/5

Movie review: Conan the Barbarian 3D

Robert E. Howard, the founding father of sword and sorcery literature, is also the creator of one of the most iconic characters in modern literature. Conan the Cimmerian, since the first Conan story was published in the weird tale magazine back in the 1930's. 80 years after the author's death, Conan has appeared in hundreds of different media productions: books, movies, comic books, video games, TV series, and even board games.

In 1982, John Milus directed the movie "Conan the Barbarian", starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. Although Arnold's Conan movie was not faithful to the original material, and was somewhat dull. The movie is considered as a cult classic today. The 1984 sequel "Conan the Destroyer", once starred by Arnie was, to be honest, a joke of a movie that was almost not watchable.

Almost 30 years later, big Hollywood studio decided to throw in big budget to reboot the Conan franchise. After a few would-be directors dropped out of the project, they finally settled with Marcus Nispel to direct a new film for the world's most legendary barbarian.

In order for me to review this movie, I will have to talk about Marcus Nispel a little bit more. To be brief, this man's entire movie directing career consist of remakes of horror movies. And so far, Mr. Nispel has yet to come come up with a movie that is even half decent.. I remember seeing an action epic movie, "Pathfinder", directed by Marcus Nispel, and I have to say that although the movie is action packed, but it bored me to death. So when I first heard that Marcus Nispel was going to direct the new Conan movie, immediately I thought the movie was going to be nothing short of a disaster. So having introducing this background, now I can go into the actual review.

The story of Conan the Barbarian is a very simple one. The bad guy is looking to re-assemble an ancient, evil relic that will give him power to rule the world. He comes to young Conan's village with his lackeys to seek a piece of that relic. They slaughtered the entire village, and killed Conan's father in front of him. Young Conan escaped, grew up big and strong, and by chance stumble upon the bad guy again. Vowed for revenge, tracked down the baddies and his lackeys, and killed them all.. barbarian style..

As a promotion strategy, the movie studio even released the movie novel a month before the movie's release. I happened to have read the movie novel of Conan the Barbarian, and I thought it actually had a half decent story. Therefore, my expectation about the movie went up a little bit despite the fact that Marcus Nispel was the director.

Then I saw the movie in the cinema, in 3D... and guess what? Being a Conan fan, I am very disappointed at how the movie turn out to be. No, it is actually not a very bad movie, but it certainly wasn't a good movie at all. From my opinion, there are only two redeeming qualities about this new Conan movie, with everything else bad, so let me talk about the good stuff first:

Firstly, the new actor who plays Conan (Jason Momoa), has done a terrific job portraying Conan. I am glad that they finally chose the right guy to play Conan. Gone is the brutish blonde haired, blue eyed, body building, viking (Northern European) look alike Arnold with unnatural sized biceps, clumsy sword play with awkward immobility problems.

Instead, the new Conan (Jason Momoa) is almost exactly what Robert E. Howard described Conan to be in his books. Black haired, bronze skin, powerfully built but athletic with incredible agility. Jason Momoa portrayed Conan as an anti hero who is dark, brooding, intelligent but not overly sophisticated, barbaric yet not primitive. Just like Robert E. Howard wanted Conan to be when he created Conan in front of his typewriter in 1932.

The second thing I like, are the action scenes and the aesthetics of this movie. The action scenes are very well done, the sword fights are great. This is attributed to Jason Momoa's physicality and the well rehearsed choreography. Conan moves with great fluidity, and the action scenes really brought to life Howard's description in his books that "Conan moves with the speed of a panther and strikes like a wounded lion". The aesthetics, although with heavily CGI effect, looks great in this movie.

Other than choice of actor, action scenes and aesthetics. Everything else about this movie is bad..

Marcus Nispel, has talents when it comes to directing action scenes and has a good taste for aesthetics. However, he has no idea how to make a movie flow smoothly. This two hour long movie has non-stop actions, but jumps from one battle scene into another, with a formulaic 30 seconds dialogue in between to connect the fight scenes. The result is an extremely fragmented, choppy movie that has zero character development, and laughable story progression.

All of the character development, background stories and character interactions present in the movie novel (pre-released by the movie studio) are all absent in the actual film! This movie feels like a 1980's video game with 30 second dialogues between boss fights that serves as mission debrief! Personally, I think Marcus Nispel is coming very close to Edwood in terms of bad directing.

Or perhaps, the movie studio has decided to cut out all the story stuff so they can make the movie shorter and fit into the standard 2 hours running time. Hence more screening time and more sales turn over.. if that is the case, I hope they will release the uncut version because I am willing to give this movie another chance.

In terms of violence, sex and nudity. This movie has some sex scenes and nudity, but it is not very bad. However, in terms of violence, it is definitely quite heavy. In Australia, this movie has MA15+ rating. However, I think it should have been R-rated due to heavy violence. There are a lot of bloood and gore as Conan engages on his personal vendetta. So I don't think this is a movie for everyone, especially if you are very sensitive about heavy violence.

Important things to think about:

There is one thing that I think is worth mentioning. In one of the scenes in the movie, Conan's romance interest asked Conan if he thinks the gods have purposes for people in this world. To Conan replied, he is not concerned about after life, and said "I live, I love, I slay, and I am content".

Now let's think about what Conan is saying here for a moment. Do you really believe that human beings serve no higher purpose other than to "live in the moment"? Note that existentialism and Nietzsche's philosophy is heavily embedded in all of Robert E. Howard's original Conan stories. Although I am a Conan fan, but I have always disagreed with Howard's view of existentialism. This is because I am a Christian, and I believe that the Bible says human beings are created by God with a special purpose, which was lived out to the full in the life of Jesus Christ in his 33 years on earth. So if you are reading this, do you really think that we have no special purpose in this world other than being content with all the material things of this world and our own works? See, Robert E. Howard, a master story writer with excellent command of English, created Conan, the world's most legendary Barbarian. Their works and stories are stuff of mythical proportion, yet both Howard and Conan will not be here forever. They are like flowers that blooms and will fade away into the sands of time, one day be forgotten. Just like this attempt to reboot the franchise will eventually fade in a few years time.

So where do you invest your life in? In the material things of the present? Or will you invest your life in the things that are eternal? Maybe it is time to think about this question before it is too late.

Final verdict:

Story 3/10: Marcus Nispel, is pretty close to Edwood as a terrible director. The plots are so choppy and fragmented that the film feels like a 2 hour long UFC pay-per-view. The only redeemable part of the story is Jason Momoa's portrayal as Conan.

Cinematography 9/10: The action scenes are great, once again attributed to Jason Momoa's ability to carry the physical role of Conan. The aesthetics are beautiful, the color contrasts, designs, production values are all top notch. In terms of cinematography, this is one of those style over substance movie. There is probably no need to watch this movie in 3D, as the 3D effects are not spectacular.

Sex and nudity: medium - There is about 30 seconds of sex scenes, and some nudity scenes, but it is not very explicit, compared to many modern day films.

Violence: Very high - There are a lot of blood and gore, the violence level is pretty high and the body count is high. If you don't like movies with a lot of violence, then I would suggest skipping this one for your own good.

Final score: 6/10 - Conan the Barbarian 3D, is a really average movie, a typical action flick and a classic example of how the movie producer, studio and the director has ruined great potentials of a concept in favor of capitalizing cash earning. Only Jason Momoa's acting, the action scenes and the aesthetics saved the movie from being a total disaster.. A sequel is probably coming in a few years time, I sincerely Mr. Nispel won't be the director again.. until the day when Hollywood decide to grow up and make a Conan movie worthy and faithful to Robert E. Howard's books, I would remain to be a fan of Conan because of those 80 years old Robert E. Howard tales.