Mind you, I have always enjoyed a
gothic novel as long as the story was creepy and intriguing, like
Dracula and Frankenstein, for
examples. However, I was under the impression that the genre
no longer has its practitioners. My impression was proven
wrong, when I discovered Carlos Ruiz Zafón and his book, The Shadow of the Wind, which made me realize the gothic genre is
alive and well.
I adored The Shadow of the Wind
as well as its two sequels; its story was beautiful and harrowing,
and I was spellbound by it. The Shadow of the Wind opened up a
new vista in my reading world. In the months that followed I
specially seek out the works of Zafón, and I read and enjoyed all of
them. Carlos Ruiz Zafón entered my list for favorite authors.
Two weeks ago, during a regular visit
to my local library I came across The Midnight Palace, which I
haven't read. I quickly loaned this book, as this is one of Zafón's
earlier works prior to The Shadow of the Wind.
Set in the 1930s, the story began on a
street in Calcutta. Under the cover of night, an English lieutenant
took flight with a pair of baby twins under his arms. At the cost of
his own life, the brave lieutenant delivered the twins, a boy and a
girl named Ben and Sheere, to places of safety. Many years later,
upon their 16th birthday, Ben and Sheere's lives suddenly
came under threat by an assailant, whose past was shrouded in mystery.
All clues pointed to a spectacular building in Calcutta – The
Midnight Place, and only the twins' loyal friends could aid them and
face the terror lurking under its shadows.
I did enjoy reading The Midnight
Palace, but I don't think this book is as good as Zafón's later
works. Make no mistake, Zafón wrote as brilliantly here as he would
in his later works, and it is not hard to see how he would go on from
here and write a masterpiece like The Shadow of the Wind later
on. The writings in this book is top notch. So why am I saying this
book is subpar to Zafóns later works? Is it the characterizations?
Well, no. This book's characterizations
were surprising good, considering its short length of 200 pages.
Zafón gave each character a personality of his and her own, and these
characters made up a memorable and likable bunch. Having said this, I
do think the protagonists, Ben and Sheree, were not portrayed with
enough depths, and so the ending (which I will not spoil here) lacked
the emotional impact that it could have had on the readers. This also
means, I think this book would have benefitted from a longer length, where Zafón could use the additional spaces to address the character
developments.
What is really holding this book back,
I opine, is the worldbuilding. Hang on, am I really saying Zafón's
worldbuilding is lacking here? Ok, I understand my opinion may raise
some eyebrows. After all, Zafón is renowned for his vivid and
beautiful depictions of Barcelona in The Shadow of the Wind and
Marina, and I adore those books because of it. So what is it about the
worldbuilding in this book that I found lacking?
Let me explain.
Zafón's works, especially The Shadow
of the Wind series, as well as Marina, are Spanish Magic
Realism novels. What is magic realism? It is a film, literary, and
visual art genre where the aesthetics and the style has magical
elements blended with the real world. In a magic realism novel (or
film), the story presents "reality" and "magic" as
the same stream of thought, and thereby presenting the magical
elements in a straightforward manner. But magic realism is not the
same as the fantasy genre. No, because fantasy is set in the fantasy
world, where magic realism is set in the real world. Moreover, what
really sets magic realism apart from fantasy is the purpose of the
magical elements; in magic realism, the author uses the magical
elements to highlight the character's inner experience and perception
of the world, to illuminate and help us look at our reality in a
different way. An example for magic realism would be Martin Scorsese's
movie, Hugo (a very good movie, BTW! Check it out if you
haven't seen it yet).
Zafón's works, including The
Midnight Palace, are all rooted in the vein of magic realism. The
Shadow of the Wind was successful, because it used the magical
elements to flash out the characters' inner emotions and experiences
about their pasts, love and hatred, and in the process making its
readers reflect on these things in our reality. The Midnight
Palace attempted to do the same, yet it came short of it, because
in this book Zafón used not magic, but supernatural elements, and the
story failed to adequately address the origin of this supernatural
occurrence. In other words, this book had a supernatural agent in the
story, but it failed to explain how did this supernatural agent came
to be. Mind you, I am not asking if such a supernatural agent is
"possible. No, as an avid reader of the fantasy genre I have no
problem with authors using supernatural elements to tell stories.
What I am saying here, without spoiling the story, is that Zafón did
not address "how" this agent, an agent whose identity is
the crux of the story, became supernatural. Instead, Zafón glossed
over it, and as a result the story lacked the power that Zafon was
trying to communicate.
Is The Midnight Palace a bad book? No, definitely not. This book may not be as good as Zafón's later works, but it is still a very good read. Under Zafón's pen, Calcutta transformed into a place of mysteries and intrigues, and his characters left lasting impressions on my mind. I think this book is still fun and worth reading, and it will find admirers among Zafón's fans.