Do you have a favorite dinosaur? My
favorite dinosaur is the triceratops. I still remember the magical
feeling that throbbed in my veins, as an eleven year old me sat in
the cinema, starred jaw-droppingly at the sight of triceratops
stomping on the silverscreen, in a movie called Jurassic Park.
More than two decades later, Hollywood is once again bringing
dinosaurs to the silverscreen. Only this time, these mighty creatures
are supposed to be bigger, badder, and appearing in 3D.
Jurassic World is the fourth
movie in the “Jurassic” franchise. It is not meant to be a
sequel, but a film aiming to reboot the franchise. This movie opened
in the cinema this weekend with a great buzz. The question is, is
this movie worth a trip to your local cinema? Today, I would like to
share my thoughts about this movie in a review that will hopefully
assist your decision-making. Let me begin, by providing a synopsis of
the movie.
Synopsis:
Twenty years has gone by since the
events in Jurassic Park. An alliance of billion-dollar corporations
maintained, and improved this theme park, renaming it “Jurassic
World”. However, after a decade of operation, the public interest
in the park began to wane.
In order to rekindle the consumer
interests and maintain the business revenue, the board members of
Jurassic World introduced a new attraction to the theme park. A new
species of dinosaur the world has never seen before. However, this
“new attraction” soon backfired and everything went horribly
wrong...
My thoughts about this movie:
I enjoyed watching Jurassic World.
But the question remains, does Jurassic World live up to the
standard set Jurassic Park? My opinion is “Not really”.
Having said this, Jurassic World
is still a lot better than Jurassic Park 2 and 3. And there
are a few enjoyable features about Jurassic world. Let me
start by sharing the things I didn't like about Jurassic World.
Firstly, I think the biggest problem of Jurassic World is the
characterizations. Every character in this movie is cartoonishly
exaggerated with stereotypes. The dialogues sometimes try to bring
comedic reliefs, but usually overshoot because they are too cheesy.
The story, on the other hand, is fairly predictable. When I watched
this movie, I already knew who was going to die and who was going to
live, there were very little twists and turns in the plot. However,
despite the predictable nature of the story, this movie managed to
maintain a thin layer of suspense that will keep the audience at the
edge of their seats.
Yet, as I have mentioned earlier,
despite all these flaws, Jurassic World is still good
entertainment. This movie knows what it is meant to be, a
blockbuster. So this movie doesn't take itself too seriously. This
also means, I think the audience can enjoy this movie, provided that
they set the correct expectations. What I am trying to say is,
Jurassic World is a monster movie. So as long as you keep this
in mind, and don't walk into the cinema expecting to see a movie
expounding the philosophical meanings of life, then you should be
able to enjoy this movie for what it is, and for what it has to offer.
While the story in Jurassic World
followed the formulaic ingredients of a Hollywood blockbuster,
but I thought the movie did (perhaps unintentionally) make an
interesting observation about the relationship between “consumer
needs and corporate mandates”. There was a scene in the movie, when
a teenage boy stood in front of a magnificent dinosaur, but the boy's
interest was occupied by his mobile phone instead. That was a
captivating scene, because it relates to the central plot of the
movie, where a company needed to rekindle consumer interests, by
re-inventing a newer, and more extreme species of dinosaur which then
backfired, causing a major catastrophe. I don't think the movie maker
was trying to send any message at all, but I thought the scene about
the boy and his mobile phone closely captured the current trend in
our society, leaving rooms for further discussions.
The main attractions for Jurassic
World, are the dinosaurs. And we can't really talk about
dinosaurs without discussing the CGI. The CGI in this movie are ok,
but they are not going to become the new benchmark for cinematic CGI. The
dinosaurs do look awesome on the silverscreen. But for some reason,
the multi-million dollar CGI just couldn't quite reproduce the
magical feelings from the original Jurassic Park. However, it
is still an incredible experience to behold the moment when the
camera focused on a low-angle shot at a 40 foot tall T-Rex, charging
to the front of the big screen in all its mighty bulk and reptilian
ferocity. It is in a cinematic moment such as this, where I find the justification to watch movies at the cinema in the days of 3D HD TVs
and blu rays.
The movie-goers have the options to
view Jurassic World in both 3D and 2D format. So is it worth
spending the extra dollars to watch this movie in 3D? I watched this
movie in 3D, and I thought the 3D presentation for Jurassic World
was pretty average. There weren't many “pop-out” moments in this movie. Meanwhile, the depth of the 3D presentation was also quite flat. I mean, for a movie like Jurassic World, I was expecting
the 3D presentation to showcase dinosaurs running out of the screen into
my face, or being able to stare into the vastness of the landscape,
but those moments didn't exist in the 3D presentation. Therefore, if
you are going to watch Jurassic World, then my opinion is the
2D version should suffice.
Jurassic World is one of the
biggest blockbuster movies of 2015. I liked this movie. It didn't
fully reproduce the charms of the original Jurassic Park, but
it is still superior than both Jurassic Park 2 and 3. I think
the greatest weakness of this movie is the cartoonish characters, and
the cheesy dialogues. The story in Jurassic World is
predictable but it does have its moments of thrills and fun. For a
monster movie, I think most people will find Jurassic World
delivers an entertaining, 2 hours long action adventure spectacle.
That is, as long as you walk into the cinema knowing you are about to
watch a monster flick.